Supreme Court to Hold Oral Arguments by Phone

Photo by Pavan Trikutam on Unsplash Zachery Hullinger, Associate Member, University of Cincinnati Law Review In response to COVID-19 and the accompanying restrictions on gatherings, the Supreme Court had previously postponed its March and April argument sessions.[1]ย On April 13, 2020, the Court took further action, announcing that it would hold oral arguments via telephone for ten sets of... Continue Reading →

Michigan v. Frederick: A Chance to Clarify Law Enforcementโ€™s Knock-and-Talk Procedures

"Doors in the interior" by Dmitry Grigoriev is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 John Simon, Blog Editor,ย University of Cincinnati Law Review I. Introduction In recent history, the Supreme Court has averaged 7,000-8,000 new petitions annually.[1] Of those new cases filed, approximately 80 receive plenary review with oral arguments heard before the Court. [2] On June... Continue Reading →

Up ↑

Skip to content