In this article, Abigail Crabtree discusses the circuit split concerning whether an employee’s private remedy under Title IX is preempted by a Title VII claim in an educational setting.
In this article, Parker Herren discusses how the ruling in Groff v. Dejoy may impact the future of employment discrimination cases regarding DEI initiatives.
In this article, Megan VanGilder discusses the growing circuit split over the proper causation standard for retaliation claims under the FMLA, breaking down the basis for the courts’ disagreements. In unraveling these issues, VanGilder argues that the Supreme Court should resolve the split and provide clear guidance for both the lower courts and litigants in these cases.
In this article, Kate Brewer delves into the growing demand for Supreme Court reform by discussing the various restrictions on Justices that have been suggested and the likelihood of a recently proposed bill's passage.
In this article, Kathyrn McIlroy discusses the circuit split on whether testers of hotel reservation websites for ADA compliance have standing to sue for violations when they do not plan on booking a reservation, ultimately arguing that the testers do have standing to sue.
In this article, Sarah Jana discusses Dominion Voting Systems’ defamation case against Fox News and explains why it is likely to be one of the few defamation cases against a news corporation that results in a win for the plaintiff.
In this article, Grant Williams discusses the history of the nondelegation doctrine and intelligible principle. The article explores the perpetual commingling of powers amongst the different branches of government and argues that the nondelegation doctrine must be invoked to prevent the creeping tyranny.
In this article, Colleen Brugger explores United States v Virginia or VMI, which not only disavowed gender generalizations, but demonstrated the scope and power of a properly tailored remedy. The Court preserved state choice yet crafted a remedy which solved a novel problem.
In this article, Thomas Kemmet analyzes the current standing doctrine in the United States and its impact on the environment and compares how other nations grant personhood to natural entities for environmental protection.
Associate Member Chris Colloton examines the recent decision from a federal court in Texas in Braidwood Management, Inc. v. Becerra. Chris argues that the judge not only misapplied the law, but moreover worked to elevate religious freedom to an untenable level at the expense of the health of millions of Americans.
