Joanna Swaiss analyzes Ohio’s proposed Holly Act and its implications for bail reform and pretrial detention. She argues that the Act’s categorical, offense-based restrictions are both constitutionally problematic and practically ineffective, as they risk sweeping in low-risk defendants while failing to identify individuals who pose genuine threats to public safety. She advocates for a more measured, evidence-driven framework centered on individualized risk assessments, judicial discretion, and reduced reliance on wealth-based detention.