Joanna Swaiss analyzes Ohioโs proposed Holly Act and its implications for bail reform and pretrial detention. She argues that the Actโs categorical, offense-based restrictions are both constitutionally problematic and practically ineffective, as they risk sweeping in low-risk defendants while failing to identify individuals who pose genuine threats to public safety. She advocates for a more measured, evidence-driven framework centered on individualized risk assessments, judicial discretion, and reduced reliance on wealth-based detention.
Theย American Dream: Idahoโs New Starter Home Bill andย theย Deregulation ofย Constructionย
New on the UC Law Review Blog, Brookelynn Stone discusses how the โAmerican Dreamโ of homeownership is increasingly out of reach for many Americans as housing costs surge nationwide. She examines how Idahoโs recent legislation seeks to restore affordability and whether state intervention is necessary when local zoning boards fail to act.
Prudence in Transition:ย Anderson v. Intel Corp.ย and the Future of Alternative Investments in Defined Contribution Plansย
In this article, Nathan Steineker analyzes how the Supreme Courtโs forthcoming decision in Anderson v. Intel Corp. and the Department of Laborโs Proposed Rule may jointly reshape ERISA fiduciary standards and expand the use of alternative investments in defined contribution plans.
Taylor Frankie Paul, Public Backlash, and The Bachelorette: Contract Law in the Age of Social Media
Kennedy Aikey examines the legal implications of ABCโs abrupt cancellation of a fully filmed season of The Bachelorette following the resurfacing of a domestic violence incident involving its lead, Taylor Frankie Paul. The piece analyzes whether ABC and Disney acted within their contractual rights, focusing on the likely presence and scope of a morality clause and how reputational harm provisions function in an era where social media can rapidly amplify public outrage
Looking Forward: How the Supreme Court’s Recent Interpretation of the Heck Bar will Impact Local Government’s Vulnerability under ยง 1983
Andrew Pyles discusses the Supreme Courtโs recent decision in Olivier v. City of Brandon and argues that the decision will have a disparate effect on municipal governments, their ability to enact local laws, and the number of lawsuits brought against them under 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983.
Punished for Pregnancy: When Medical Neglect in Local Jails Becomes Cruel and Unusual Punishment
In this Article, Mofe Koya examines how systemic medical neglect of pregnant women in state jails raises serious Eighth Amendment concerns. She further explains how inadequate medical care and the absence of federal standards that require a minimum level of prenatal care during incarceration have transformed pregnancy in custody into cruel and unusual and therefore unconstitutional punishment.
Regulating the Climate Crisis: Federal Authority and the Future of Environmental Governance
Jack Frischen examines how climate change escalation could strain existing U.S. environmental law and emergency powers, raising the risk of expanded federal control if meaningful reform is delayed. He argues that strengthening environmental regulation is essential to safeguard democratic governance and prevent crisis-driven overreach.
Residential or Commercial: Legal Ambiguity in Short-Term Rental Regulation
Katie Bunch examines the legal regulation of short-term rental platforms under municipal zoning law, analyzing how traditional land use classifications, varying ordinance language, and differing judicial interpretations influence the treatment of Airbnb and Vrbo properties. She evaluates how clearer statutory definitions and balancing approaches could reduce ambiguity and improve consistency in zoning enforcement.
Elon Musk’s Twitter Acquisition: Securities Fraud Regulation on Social Media
Stella Brocker analyzes a recent class-action lawsuit against Elon Musk, where a jury found that he committed securities fraud during his 2022 Twitter acquisition. She analyzes whether Muskโs actions legally constituted securities fraud and the broader policy implications of this verdict. Ultimately, she argues that the current securities fraud regulations should be modified to allow for actions brought under a lower standard of culpability to hold rich and powerful actors accountable for negligent behavior on social media.
Fueling a Trademark Fight: Buc-ee’s and Mickey’s Gas Station Dispute
Josh Smith explores a recent trademark infringement lawsuit filed by the well-known gas station brand, Buc eeโs, against Mickeyโs, a regional gas station in northeast Ohio. This article examines the application of the Lanham Act to the facts of the case while also considering whether Buc eeโs is asserting a trademark overreach rather than protecting a legally distinctive and enforceable mark.
