Author: Matthew Byrnes, Associate Member, University of Cincinnati Law Review In late April, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments on a case that has the potential to drastically change how Americans watch broadcast programming. The case, American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. v. Aereo, Inc., (“Aereo”) involves the online television subscription service Aereo.[i] Founded in 2012, Aereo... Continue Reading →
Where Due Process and Equal Protection Meet: Articulating the “Fundamental Right” of Marriage
Author: Ryan Goellner, Associate Member, University of Cincinnati Law Review Since the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Windsor[1] last summer, two questions have been on many court watchers’ minds. First, after Windsor articulated a lengthy reasoning for its decision to strike down the Defense of Marriage Act, under what standard of review will... Continue Reading →
Cracking Windsor’s Code: The Unusual Judicial Review Standard of United States v. Windsor and Its Potential Impact on Future Plaintiffs
Author: Colin P. Pool, Publications Editor, University of Cincinnati Law Review The Supreme Court’s opinion in U.S. v. Windsor, [1] which struck down Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), has been criticized by many for a perceived “lack of clarity,”[2] or a lack of “parameters, . . . objective analysis, [or] guidance as to how to... Continue Reading →