Author: Rebecca Dussich, Associate Member, University of Cincinnati Law Review
Among the petitions reviewed during the Supreme Court’s September conference was a request to reverse a Seventh Circuit decision, City of Indianapolis v. Annex Books, in which the court invalidated an Indianapolis ordinance that restricted the permissible hours of operation for “adult entertainment businesses.” The Supreme Court denied certiorari. In that case, the Seventh Circuit held that the Indianapolis ordinance was unsupported by evidence of a justifiable government interest to restrict First Amendment rights. The Seventh Circuit’s decision employed a foundational standard of free speech jurisprudence originally set forth in Renton v. Playtime Theaters and the denial of certiorari confirms the interpretation of this standard by lower courts. The Supreme Court was correct to allow the Seventh Circuit’s holding to stand. Had the Court granted certiorari and reversed the Seventh Circuit’s decision, this case would have signaled the first major shift in time, place, manner jurisprudence in almost three decades.