Advancing Computation Of Just Compensation: An AI-Based Approach To Property Valuation In Eminent Domain

In this article, Molly McInnis examines the application of AI-based property valuation models in the context of eminent domain. She analyzes both the advantages and risks this technology may present in condemnation proceedings and advocates for expert oversight of the technology to ensure accuracy and fairness. Her analysis addresses this issue in the context of the Fifth Amendment’s guarantee of just compensation, arguing that the strategic use of AI could work to strengthen this constitutional safeguard for property owners.

The New Age Of Child Labor: Family Influencing And Child Exploitation

In this article, Devin Scarborough examines the rise of family influencing in online platforms and the associated risks it poses to child participants. She contends that existing labor regulations are insufficient to properly address the exploitation of child influencers, despite acknowledging recent, although limited, state legislation. This article advocates for stronger legal protections to safeguard the well-being and overall safety of children featured in online content.

Back To Bork: The Video Privacy Protection Act’s Struggle to Define “Consumer” In The Digital Age

In this article, Mofe Koya examines the emerging circuit split between the Seventh and Sixth Circuits over who qualifies as a “consumer” under the Video Privacy Protection Act. She first traces the Act’s history, then analyzes how conflicting interpretations in the streaming era have created uncertainty for both companies and users. Finally, she returns to the statute’s original intent and argues that Supreme Court intervention is necessary to ensure the VPPA is applied consistently and in line with its privacy-protective purpose.

From Bragging Rights to Bargaining Rights: The Case for Recognizing College Athletes as Employees

In this article, Emmy Blane analyzes whether college athletes are employees in response to In Re: College Athlete NIL Litigation which allows universities to directly share athletic revenue with college athletes. Ultimately, arguing that college athletes should be recognized as employees, this article further examines the implications of college athletes unionizing and collectively bargaining

Proselytize or Pay: Religious Exemptions in Catholic Charities v. Wisconsin

In this article, Maria Tobergte analyzes Catholic Charities v. Wisconsin, a case addressing whether a religiously affiliated organization can claim an exemption from Wisconsin’s unemployment tax program on the grounds that it operates primarily for religious purposes. She assesses the outcome of the case and argues the most principled way to determine eligibility for such exemptions is to evaluate how an organization’s activities reflect its sincerely held religious beliefs, not whether the organization’s activities align with the state’s definition of typical religious behavior.

Up ↑

Skip to content