In this article, Devin Scarborough examines the rise of family influencing in online platforms and the associated risks it poses to child participants. She contends that existing labor regulations are insufficient to properly address the exploitation of child influencers, despite acknowledging recent, although limited, state legislation. This article advocates for stronger legal protections to safeguard the well-being and overall safety of children featured in online content.
Limited Licenses And Limited Justice: Rethinking LLPs And The Access-to-Justice Gap
In this article, Brooke Karsteter examines whether limited license legal professionals address legal deserts or risk creating a two-tier system and consumer harm. She argues data and design choices matter more than slogans and points to targeted, attorney-led reform as better first step for improving rural access.
From Bragging Rights to Bargaining Rights: The Case for Recognizing College Athletes as Employees
In this article, Emmy Blane analyzes whether college athletes are employees in response to In Re: College Athlete NIL Litigation which allows universities to directly share athletic revenue with college athletes. Ultimately, arguing that college athletes should be recognized as employees, this article further examines the implications of college athletes unionizing and collectively bargaining
Segar and Morris Class: Settlement Achieved in Longstanding Racial Discrimination Case Against the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agencyย
In this article, Michelle L. Hampton explores a muted victory in a significant historical case involving a federal agency and its racial discrimination in employment practices. This article acknowledges the ruling's implications and predicts possible ripple effects for minority employees and employers.
How a Recent Starbucks Case Could Strengthen Teamstersโ Ability to Collectively Bargain with Costco
In this article, Casey Semple discusses how actions taken by Costco during contract negotiations with Teamsters could be considered unlawful after recent Starbucks litigation.
It Ends with a Lawsuit: Whether the Smear Campaign Against Blake Lively Constitutes Title VII Retaliation
In this article, Autumn Christafore discusses Blake Livelyโs recent lawsuit, alleging sexual harassment and retaliation, against Justin Baldoni and Wayfarer Studios. Specifically, she analyzes whether a smear campaign constitutes Title VII Retaliation, as well as Livelyโs likelihood of success on her retaliation claim.
Intersecting Rights: Exploring Preemption in Title VII and Title IX Claims
In this article, Abigail Crabtree discusses the circuit split concerning whether an employeeโs private remedy under Title IX is preempted by a Title VII claim in an educational setting.
Call Me by My Name: The Future of Religious Accommodations under Groff v. DeJoyย
In this article, Parker Herren discusses how the ruling in Groff v. Dejoy may impact the future of employment discrimination cases regarding DEI initiatives.
In Search of a Standard: Unraveling the Emerging Circuit Split over the Proper Causation Standard for Retaliation Claims under the FMLAย
In this article, Megan VanGilder discusses the growing circuit split over the proper causation standard for retaliation claims under the FMLA, breaking down the basis for the courtsโ disagreements. In unraveling these issues, VanGilder argues that the Supreme Court should resolve the split and provide clear guidance for both the lower courts and litigants in these cases.
Got Non-Dairy Milk?ย
Got Non-Dairy Milk? Dunkinโ Donuts is facing a class action lawsuit where plaintiffs allege that their upcharge for non-dairy milk alternatives constitutes discrimination under the ADA. This article explores the legal arguments the parties raise in their initial pleadings, ranging from personal jurisdiction to the ADAโs definition of disability.
