In this article, Autumn Christafore discusses the issues and arguments presented in Texas v. Becerra, and explores the potential motives behind the lawsuit.
Decoding Texas v. Becerra: Exploring the Potential Motives Behind the Lawsuit
Goodbye Brunner: Rethinking the Standard for Discharging Student Loan Debt in Bankruptcy
In this article, Maria Tobergte discusses the circuit split regarding the meaning of “undue hardship”—the standard that student loan debtors must meet in order to discharge their student loans in bankruptcy. She argues for the majority approach to be abandoned and for the minority approach to be adopted by more courts.
Gaming the System? How TikTok v. Garland Could Shape the Future of Tencent
In this article, Katerina Fernandez examines how TikTok v. Garland establishes a legal framework that could be applied to Tencent, the Chinese tech giant behind several major gaming platforms. The article explores the national security concerns driving U.S. regulatory scrutiny of foreign-owned digital platforms and the potential constitutional and economic challenges of imposing similar restrictions on Tencent.
Super Bowl LIX’s Real Contest: Compounded Drugs and Hims & Hers’s “Misleading” Ad
In this article, JT DeGrinney discusses the controversy surrounding Hims & Hers’s Super Bowl ad. He outlines compounded drugs’ regulatory background and considers arguments for considering the ad “misleading.”
The PGA Tour – LIV Merger: How Antitrust Laws Could Stand in the Way
In this article, Brett Blair explores the potential antitrust issues underlying the proposed merger between the PGA Tour and LIV Golf.
The Good Faith Exception in the Age of Cell Phones: Ohio’s Approach and What it Signals
In this article, Hannah Riggle explores the Ohio Supreme Court’s recent decision in State v. Schubert, focusing on the analysis that the court conducted to determine that the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule had been incorrectly applied by the trial court.
The Hidden Risks of Legal Cannabis: How State-by-State Regulations Contribute to Contamination and Health Hazards
In this article, Emma Wozniak examines how inconsistent state regulations on cannabis contamination create serious health risks for consumers. With no federal oversight, varying standards for testing pesticides, heavy metals, and other toxins leave users vulnerable to unsafe products.
Data Privacy in the Digital Age: A Comparative Analysis of U.S. and EU Regulations
In this article, Elias Aidun explores the key differences between the GDPR and U.S. data privacy laws, highlighting their legal implications and the future of privacy regulation.
How a Recent Starbucks Case Could Strengthen Teamsters’ Ability to Collectively Bargain with Costco
In this article, Casey Semple discusses how actions taken by Costco during contract negotiations with Teamsters could be considered unlawful after recent Starbucks litigation.
It Ends with a Lawsuit: Whether the Smear Campaign Against Blake Lively Constitutes Title VII Retaliation
In this article, Autumn Christafore discusses Blake Lively’s recent lawsuit, alleging sexual harassment and retaliation, against Justin Baldoni and Wayfarer Studios. Specifically, she analyzes whether a smear campaign constitutes Title VII Retaliation, as well as Lively’s likelihood of success on her retaliation claim.