In this article, Christian Bugher discusses the proposed amendment to the Kentucky Constitution that will appear on the ballot for Kentucky voters in November. Amendment 2 will allow voters to choose whether taxpayer funds can be allocated to education outside of the state public school system.
In this article, Erin Gray discusses the upcoming TikTok ban and the resulting lawsuit TikTok filed against the United States. Gray explores how the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit may rule on TikTok's First Amendment challenge of the ban.
Kiera Burns discusses the right to family life and family unity amid situations of armed conflict and immigration policies. She makes further analysis of solutions to the family unit crisis following a human rights-based approach.
In this article, Madisen Zent discusses the circuit split among the United States circuit courts of appeal in allocating the burden of proof in competency hearings and the potential due process violations.
In this article, Elias Aidun discusses how the recent ruling in LKQ v. GM may significantly change the landscape for design patents, as the standard for determining “obviousness” has been redefined.
Jasmyn Hardin goes beyond the detrimental impacts that abortion restrictions have had on women’s health to examine the broader effects on the healthcare system and society at large. She argues that these policies are erecting new societal barriers while simultaneously exacerbating systemic failures, disproportionately worsening health disparities among groups that have historically faced societal oppression.
In this article, Callie Mobley explores what could be done both internationally and in the United States to protect cultural property looted during Sudan’s civil war.
Carrington Calder examines the rise of celebrity SLAPP suits and how it could change the landscape of anti-SLAPP suit legislation.
In this article, Abigail Crabtree discusses the circuit split concerning whether an employee’s private remedy under Title IX is preempted by a Title VII claim in an educational setting.
In this article, Abigail Adu discusses how the Court of Arbitration for Sport stripped Jordan Chiles of the bronze medal she won in the 2024 Olympic floor final. In addressing the fallacies of the court's reasoning, Adu discusses Chiles' avenues for appeal and proposes how the court should have ruled in favor of Chiles based on recognized concepts of fairness and equity.
