Mofe Koya examines the arrests of journalists Don Lemon and Georgia Fort in Minneapolis, Minnesota following their controversial coverage of anti-U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement protests. She begins by discussing the circumstances surrounding the arrests before turning to an analysis of First Amendment protections for journalists and the essential role of the press in a democratic society. The article concludes by considering the broader implications of the arrests, including the precedent it may set and the policy considerations courts will need to address moving forward.
Between Tinker and Fraser: The Impacts of the Sixth Circuit’s Decision in B.A. v. Tri County Area Schools
Faith Howard examines the Sixth Circuitโs recent decision in D.A. v. Tri County Area Schools.ย Ultimately, arguing that the Supreme Court should take the decision up for review to help certify for lower federal courts the extent to which the Fraser standard regarding student speech should apply.
“Revival” or Rip-Off: The Federal Government’s Use of Zach Bryan’s Hit Song
Joshua Smith explores how the federal governmentโs use of Zach Bryanโs hit song โRevivalโ for immigration agent recruitment exposes unresolved tensions between copyright protection, expressive autonomy, and the limits of government speech.
Bars Behind Bars: When Song Lyrics Become Criminal Evidence
Joshua Smith examines the prosecution of rapper Young Thug and his record label, Young Stoner Life, focusing on the permissibility of rap lyrics as evidence in criminal trials. It explores the tension between artistic expression and free speech, analyzing key rulings and legal standards while situating the case within broader debates on race, cultural biases, and First Amendment boundaries.
Burning Issues: Potential Viewpoint Discrimination In Trump’s Flag Desecration Order
In this article, Faith Howard examines President Trumpโs recent executive order titled, โProsecuting Burning of the American Flag.โ Ultimately, arguing that, despite the presidentโs assertion that the order aligns with the First Amendment, where it may encounter legal challenges in federal courts concerning the issue of viewpoint discrimination.
Proselytize or Pay: Religious Exemptions in Catholic Charities v. Wisconsin
In this article, Maria Tobergte analyzes Catholic Charities v. Wisconsin, a case addressing whether a religiously affiliated organization can claim an exemption from Wisconsinโs unemployment tax program on the grounds that it operates primarily for religious purposes. She assesses the outcome of the case and argues the most principled way to determine eligibility for such exemptions is to evaluate how an organizationโs activities reflect its sincerely held religious beliefs, not whether the organizationโs activities align with the stateโs definition of typical religious behavior.
A Lyrical Battle Turned Legal: Drakeโs Odds of Success in his Defamation Suit over Kendrick Lamarโs โNot Like Usโ
In this article, Maria Tobergte examines Drakeโs lawsuit against the producer of the song โNot Like Usโ for its allegedly defamatory lyrics. She concludes that Drake is unlikely to succeed, as the lyrics are more likely hyperbolic rhetoric rather than factual statements.
Gaming the System? How TikTok v. Garland Could Shape the Future of Tencent
In this article, Katerina Fernandez examines how TikTok v. Garland establishes a legal framework that could be applied to Tencent, the Chinese tech giant behind several major gaming platforms. The article explores the national security concerns driving U.S. regulatory scrutiny of foreign-owned digital platforms and the potential constitutional and economic challenges of imposing similar restrictions on Tencent.
The Ten Commandments in Public Schools: Why a Louisiana Law Violates the Establishment Clause
In this article, Erin Gray discusses Louisianaโs Ten Commandments law and the Middle District of Louisianaโs decision to strike down the law as unconstitutional under the Establishment Clause.
Respect My CROWN: The Continued Fight Against Hair Discrimination
Jasmyn Hardin explains how the absence of federal protections for natural and protective hairstyles enables discriminatory grooming policies to persistently function as a means of control and punishment for Black people, leaving them with a difficult choice: conform to White normative standards or suffer the consequences.
