AI is transforming ADA litigation, making it easier than ever for serial filers to generate high volume claims. But as courts confront fabricated citations and AI assisted filings, the system’s vulnerabilities are becoming increasingly apparent. In her latest article, Mofe Koya explores how AI is reshaping enforcement—and the challenges that come with it.
Brooke Karsteter analyzes how the recently vacated Seventh Circuit panel opinion in Arana v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, which dramatically expanded institutional Title IX liability, positions the full court’s impending en banc review as a pivotal moment for determining the scope of school obligations to student victims.
In this Article, Abriana Malfatti analyzes the implications of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Noem v. Vazquez Perdomo. By comparing Justice Kavanaugh’s concurrence and Justice Sotomayor’s dissent, she argues that the American public should be concerned with the Supreme Court’s use of the Emergency Docket to weaken United States citizens’ Fourth Amendment Rights. She then concludes that in granting the stay, the Supreme Court allows practices that imply that there is a certain way to look that makes one more American.
Emmy Blane analyzes the federal government’s consideration of apparent race or ethnicity in immigration investigations under the Equal Protection framework established in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard College (“SFFA”). This Article contends that the government’s race-based decision-making in immigration enforcement does not satisfy the SFFA standards and, therefore, is unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
In this article, Faith Howard examines President Trump’s recent executive order titled, “Prosecuting Burning of the American Flag.” Ultimately, arguing that, despite the president’s assertion that the order aligns with the First Amendment, where it may encounter legal challenges in federal courts concerning the issue of viewpoint discrimination.
In this article, Brooke Karsteter examines whether limited license legal professionals address legal deserts or risk creating a two-tier system and consumer harm. She argues data and design choices matter more than slogans and points to targeted, attorney-led reform as better first step for improving rural access.
In this article, Michelle L. Hampton explores a muted victory in a significant historical case involving a federal agency and its racial discrimination in employment practices. This article acknowledges the ruling's implications and predicts possible ripple effects for minority employees and employers.
In this article, Michelle L. Hampton analyzes a matter of first impression considering the extension of Title VI protections within federally funded healthcare facilities. This article is written in favor of the extended protections; however, with the recent overturning of several decades-long established precedents, this article acknowledges the possibility that the extension of such racial discriminatory protections may not be granted.
In this article, Autumn Christafore discusses the issues and arguments presented in Texas v. Becerra, and explores the potential motives behind the lawsuit.
In this article, Autumn Christafore discusses Blake Lively’s recent lawsuit, alleging sexual harassment and retaliation, against Justin Baldoni and Wayfarer Studios. Specifically, she analyzes whether a smear campaign constitutes Title VII Retaliation, as well as Lively’s likelihood of success on her retaliation claim.
