In this article, Kathyrn McIlroy discusses the circuit split on whether testers of hotel reservation websites for ADA compliance have standing to sue for violations when they do not plan on booking a reservation, ultimately arguing that the testers do have standing to sue.
The filming of police officers by citizens has played an important role in the movement for police reform and accountability. In this article, Sarah Jana explains the different ways that circuit courts across the country have addressed that right under the doctrine of qualified immunity and argues that the Supreme Court should declare that it is clearly established.
In this article, Grant Williams discusses the future of affirmative action on college campuses in wake of two Supreme Court cases that question its constitutionality. He postulates the use of affirmative action violates the Equal Protection Clause and calls on universities to focus on other means of achieving diversity through the non-innate characteristics of applicants.
In this article, Tori DeLaney discusses the state of content moderation as it relates to LGBTQ+ content creators and how public accommodation laws and principles might be used to expand the liability of social media companies who engage in discriminatory content moderation practices.
In this article, Caroline Hardig examines the circuit split over whether plasma donation centers fall under the definition of a service establishment protected by the ADA.
Associate Member Haley Dominique explores how intercollegiate athletic programs must proceed with caution regarding the new NIL world and Title IX.
Associate Member Haley Dominique explores the Speak Out Act and how the #MeToo movement continues to drive change for survivors of sexual misconduct in the workplace.
Associate Member Stephen Fox explains the circuit split on what constitutes new evidence when claiming actual innocence in a petition for writ of habeas corpus.
In his first article for the Blog, Associate Member Chris Colloton advocates for the passage of the Ohio Fairness Act to extend the state’s current anti-discrimination statute to its LGBTQ citizens and suggests that the Ohio puts itself at a significant disadvantage by not doing so.