Brookelynn Stone examines Cavalleri v. Hermès International, a case challenging Hermès’ sales practices as an unlawful tying arrangement in violation of the Sherman Act. She analyzes the plaintiffs’ allegations and the district court’s reasoning for dismissal, and evaluates the potential implications of a Ninth Circuit reversal for antitrust treatment of luxury markets, while also considering what additional facts could have strengthened the plaintiffs’ claims to better support their antitrust theories beyond mere speculation.