Blog Articles

Gender: The Issue of Immutability

Photo by Cecilie Johnsen on Unsplash Silver Flight, Associate Member, University of Cincinnati Law Review I. Introduction The United States legal system generally holds that individuals should not be discriminated against on the basis of immutable characteristics. However, not all immutable characteristics are protected, and not all characteristics that are protected are immutable. This article questions the role... Continue Reading →

State v. Chapman Makes It Harder to Impose Community Control Conditions Restricting the Right to Procreate

Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on Unsplash Bailey Wharton, Associate Member, University of Cincinnati Law Review I. Introduction While State v. Chapman is not the first case in Ohio to disallow a restriction on procreation as a condition of community control, the majority decision will certainly make it more difficult for trial courts to permissibly impose this... Continue Reading →

Is the Chinese Communist Party Guilty of the Crime of Genocide Against the Uyghurs?

Photo by Fakurian Design on Unsplash Mallory Perazzo, Associate Member, University of Cincinnati College of Law I. Introduction After the end of the Holocaust in 1945, the world pledged โ€œnever forget, never again,โ€ but humans and governments have consistently broken that pledge.[1] The promise means to continuously tell the story of the genocide that took the lives of six... Continue Reading →

Exclusive Exclusionary Rule: Does an Unsigned Warrant Qualify Under the Good-faith Exception?

Photo by mdfriendofhillary on Creative Commons Sara Leonhartsberger, Associate Member, University of Cincinnati Law Review I. Introduction The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution protects against law enforcementโ€™s unreasonable searches and seizures when investigating members of the public.[1] In furtherance of this constitutional protection, the Supreme Court of the United States created the exclusionary... Continue Reading →

Can Governors Use Emergency Powers to Prevent Government Response to an Emergency?: A Look at Executive Preemption of Local Law

Photo by Jesse Collins on Unsplash Andrew Lance, Associate Member, University of Cincinnati Law Review I. Introduction Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, governors have exercised significant authority through their stateโ€™s emergency statute. These statutes have questionable effectiveness because government leaders disagree on the severity of the emergency and, in some cases, whether one exists at all, leaving the different... Continue Reading →

Trick or Treater? The difficulties in treating physiciansโ€™ testimonies

Photo by National Cancer Institute on Unsplash Patrick Mullinger, Associate Member, University of Cincinnati Law Review I. Introduction          The treating physician: one of the most important people in your life when youโ€™re sick or injured, and one of the most difficult witnesses when determining what testimony is allowable in a court. In the federal courts, Fed. R. Civ.... Continue Reading →

Ice Ice, Maybe?: Do University Bias Incident Report Teams Really Chill Student Speech, or Are They Just a Conduit?

Photo by Philippe Bout on Unsplash Shelbi Shultz, Associate Member, University of Cincinnati Law Review I. Introduction Throughout American history, universities have served as a battleground for free speech debate as it applies to the First Amendment. A current focus of discussion are Bias Incident Report Teams (BIRTs) that have proliferated higher education in recent years.[1] Generally, these... Continue Reading →

The Parent Trap: Parents With Disabilities and the Flaws within Termination of Parental Rights Proceedings

Photo by Guillaume de Germain on Unsplash Erica Anderson, Notes and Comments Chair, University of Cincinnati College of Law I. Introduction โ€œIt is better for all the world if, instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind.... Continue Reading →

A head-spinning opinion: Supreme Court of Ohio rules mental health records are not privileged in a claim for child custody and spousal support

Photo by Beatriz Pรฉrez Moya on Unsplash Susana Tolentino, Associate Member, University of Cincinnati Law Review I. Introduction It is crucial to trust in the confidentiality of mental health treatment sessions because โ€œthe mere possibility of disclosure of confidential communications may impede the development of the relationship necessary for successful treatment.โ€[1] The Supreme Court of Ohioโ€™s decision in... Continue Reading →

Up ↑

Skip to content